The decks that get funded answer five questions in the first four minutes.

A partner spends under four minutes on your deck, looking for a few specific things in a specific order. We put your deck through those questions — the eight a seed partner actually asks — and mark it up slide by slide, so you see exactly where it loses them before a fund does.

Get my deck scored → Plans start at $9.99. Five questions to start — no card today.
View full pricing packages → See what an analysis looks like
Where Decks Lose

It's rarely the business. It's almost always the deck.

The same handful of gaps show up over and over, in decks behind businesses that are genuinely fundable. Here's what a partner actually sees.

The traction slide shows activity, not evidence.

The market slide is top-down, and the partner stopped believing it at "$X billion TAM."

There's no slide answering "why you."

The ask has no use of funds.

What You Get Back

Not "make it compelling." The exact gap, and the fix.

A sample of what your analysis looks like — the eight questions a seed partner works through, then every slide in your deck marked up against them.

Sample analysis · not a real founder's deck
Needs work before you send it3 of 8 questions actually answered
Read against
The core idea · Founder–problem fit · Market · Traction · Growth · Competition · Moat · Business model
What your deck should be saying
"Fleet maintenance software for the mid-size logistics operators nobody sells to, in a market where a breakdown costs more than the software does."
Slide 4 — Traction · 🟡 Needs work
You're saying
Signups and app opens, climbing over six months.
An investor hears
Activity, not evidence. No retention, no revenue, no customer named — so nothing here says anyone needs this.
What we'd change: replace the activity chart with three numbers that prove pull — week-4 retention, revenue or signed LOIs, and your biggest customer's name.
Slide 6 — Market · ⚠️ Working against you
You're saying
"$4.2B TAM," from a market report.
An investor hears
A partner stops reading top-down TAM at the first billion. It says nothing about who buys, and it costs you credibility on the slides after it.
What we'd change: lead with your actual first 100 customers and what each pays, then build the market up from there.
Founder–problem fit · Not answered
You're saying
Founder bios and past employers, on slide 9.
An investor hears
Nothing about why this team wins this market. A bio is a CV; it isn't an unfair advantage.
What we'd change: one line per founder tying their background directly to an edge in this exact market — what you know that an outsider doesn't.
Slide 11 — The Ask · 🟡 Needs work
You're saying
"Raising $500K."
An investor hears
No use of funds and no milestones, so there's no way to tell what the $500K buys or what it proves.
What we'd change: break the raise into three or four line items, each tied to the milestone it unlocks.

Your real analysis covers all eight questions and every slide in your deck, not just four.

Then Fix It

Two ways to use the notes. Both are fine.

Fix it in our editor

Slide-level AI editing, chart rebuilding, and PDF export — go from the gap we found straight into the fix, in the same workspace.

Or take the notes anywhere

The analysis is yours. Fix it in Google Slides, Keynote, or with a designer — no lock-in, no penalty for leaving.

Don't have a deck yet? Generate one first →

Who's Behind The Score

Your deck is read against the eight questions a seed partner works through, in the order they work through them — the same standard behind Funding Concierge's deck feedback "from someone who has raised before," not a generic checklist. On Premium, a person reads every analysis and signs it off before you see it; on Basic and Growth it reaches you as soon as it's done.

What's Included

Unlimited reads. Nine writes. Here's why.

Analysis is cheap to give you as much of as you need. Editing is craft — a person doing real work on your slides — so it's capped at a number we can actually deliver well.

Unlimited analysis, 2 months

Re-run the scoring as many times as you revise. No cap on reads.

Up to 9 edits

Nine rounds of slide-level edits in the workspace, applied by a person. Premium only.

Applied to every application

The same fixed deck attaches to every application you submit through us. See open funds →

This is our top package — unlimited analysis and edits for a fixed price over two months. Prefer to start smaller? Compare all packages →

Your deck is the only thing standing between this business and a yes.

Find out exactly where it loses a partner, before the next fund tells you "not a fit right now."

Get my deck scored → View full pricing packages →